Something Completely Different

Community section => The Lounge => Topic started by: jimmy jazz on Mar 29, 2024, 09:31 PM

Title: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Mar 29, 2024, 09:31 PM
Is something pissing you off? Are you angry? Do you want to vent somewhere?

No matter how big or small the problem is, this thread is for all of our fuming forumistas to let off some steam.

Tetley Tea is shite. Asda had no Yorkshire Tea. Doubling up with the tea bags and it still tastes like warm water.

I remember @Thelonious Monkey saying anyone who drinks anythkng other than Yorkshire Tea is a fool and he's not wrong.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Mar 29, 2024, 09:41 PM
Great idea! This is the thread I needed when my fucking smoke alarm batteries were dying!  :laughing:
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Apr 04, 2024, 11:19 PM
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTAEnuN8ne-wXlKykfxWNI6QOTzFC6sOSSeFnd1MHJ88Q&s)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Jul 13, 2024, 02:13 AM
OK, time to rant.
Charli XC bloody X! Look at her current album sleeve! How much did that cost, eh? Cheaper if you don't use capital letters, Ms. XCX?
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/60/Charli_XCX_-_Brat_%28album_cover%29.png/440px-Charli_XCX_-_Brat_%28album_cover%29.png)

That's bad enough, but THIS is just taking the piss!
(https://i.scdn.co/image/ab67616d0000b27351d8df7a57a0af8a4b6ee585)

So here she's saying this is exactly the same album, but there are three more songs on this. So if you want them, you have to shell out all over again. Now I KNOW in this climate you can just download the three tracks separately, so, so what? But if you're an album collector, and for some reason you collect her music, you're going to be paying double. And to me, this is a real finger to the fans. Not only is it that, but it's a conscious, deliberate one: look what you have to do if you want to get my other three songs. It's rude and it's offensive, not that I care. But I hate the way it's presented. Fuck Charli and fuck her label. Not literally.

Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Jul 13, 2024, 02:53 AM
I kinda don't care about her music - I'm not a pop fan - but the barefaced cheek of grinning at your fans that you want to squeeze them for more money just grinds my gears, especially in this era when money is tight and record companies should be doing all they can to promote, not cause people to avoid, album sales. Then again, like banks, when have record labels ever learned from their many mistakes?  ::)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Marie Monday on Jul 13, 2024, 12:34 PM
Uh everyone in pop music does the three extra songs thing, you're just suddenly mad because you're noticing it now because she's upfront about it.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jul 25, 2024, 03:24 PM
Liberal white girls are the fakest people out there. They are typically secretly racist narcissists that only care about issues that put them at the center of attention but will quickly throw any marginalized group under the bus for even remotely inconveniencing them.

They will put BLM in their bio for virtue signaling brownie points while also pushing the false narrative that black people are sexual predators because that makes them feel like a victim. Hillary Clinton.

Liberal white girls are the types to get into 1 lesbian relationship so they can wear the marginalized group girl scout badge and try to justify their right to use homophobic slurs.

Liberal white girls love to insinuate that migrants are rapists, too.

Liberal white girls love making as many black friends as possible so they can tokenize their relationship behind their backs and justify the horrendous shit they say about black people behind their backs.



Don't get me started on white rappers.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lexi Darling on Jul 25, 2024, 04:27 PM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Jul 25, 2024, 03:24 PMLiberal white girls are the fakest people out there. They are typically secretly racist narcissists that only care about issues that put them at the center of attention but will quickly throw any marginalized group under the bus for even remotely inconveniencing them.

They will put BLM in their bio for virtue signaling brownie points while also pushing the false narrative that black people are sexual predators because that makes them feel like a victim. Hillary Clinton.

Liberal white girls are the types to get into 1 lesbian relationship so they can wear the marginalized group girl scout badge and try to justify their right to use homophobic slurs.

Liberal white girls love to insinuate that migrants are rapists, too.

Liberal white girls love making as many black friends as possible so they can tokenize their relationship behind their backs and justify the horrendous shit they say about black people behind their backs.



Don't get me started on white rappers.


I feel like I know similar kinds of people to what you're talking about.

It reminds me of back in my Tumblr days when I got ripped to shreds for arguing against a bunch of 'social justice' bloggers who were saying that Bruno Mars should not be allowed to make funk music because he isn't black.

Or the time I was told by TERFs that as a trans woman, me enjoying giving oral pleasure to my male partner was me "acting out my innate male-socialized misogyny" and that somehow invalidated both my gender identity and my support for feminism.

For being people with such progressive stances they tend to do a lot of shaming and finger pointing and policing of people on their own side.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jul 25, 2024, 05:04 PM
That's just annoying woke scolds. They come in all colors.

What I'm talking about definitely falls into that, though. Liberal white girls love making issues where there is none, like the Bruno Mars thing, for the social credit they get from portraying progressiveness. I think it's easier to make up something to be outraged at than to actually talk about systemic issues, especially for Liberal white girls who have to admit that they benefit from the current system.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: degrassiknoll on Jul 25, 2024, 06:27 PM
Lol releasing brat with three new songs was a deliberate dig at Taylor Swift releasing derivatives in order to manipulate the charts.

It's ok to just say "I don't get it" :p
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: degrassiknoll on Jul 25, 2024, 06:28 PM
I'd argue the only thing worse than white liberal women are white liberal men
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jul 25, 2024, 06:32 PM
Quote from: degrassi.knoll on Jul 25, 2024, 06:28 PMI'd argue the only thing worse than white liberal women are white liberal men

Same boat but I have less experience with them.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: degrassiknoll on Jul 25, 2024, 06:35 PM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Jul 25, 2024, 06:32 PMSame boat but I have less experience with them.

Same shit but they also use their virtue signaling bleeding hearts to seduce girls that look 18
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jul 25, 2024, 06:38 PM
Quote from: degrassi.knoll on Jul 25, 2024, 06:35 PMSame shit but they also use their virtue signaling bleeding hearts to seduce girls that look 18

Makes sense. I know the fake feminist archetype that pretends to be a feminist to get into women's pants.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: degrassiknoll on Jul 25, 2024, 06:39 PM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Jul 25, 2024, 06:38 PMMakes sense. I know the fake feminist archetype that pretends to be a feminist to get into women's pants.

Yeah it's one of those single circle diagrams lol
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Janszoon on Jul 25, 2024, 07:08 PM
Summer can fuck off. Fuck the heat. Fuck the humidity. Fuck sitting around sweating. Fuck the bugs. Fuck the smell of baking garbage. Fuck the people blasting shitty music from their Polaris Slingshots. And mostly importantly, fuck the forced fun of "enjoying" the "nice" weather.

Bring on the fall ASAP.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Jul 25, 2024, 08:08 PM
Quote from: degrassi.knoll on Jul 25, 2024, 06:28 PMI'd argue the only thing worse than white liberal women are white liberal men

Relevant.

White liberals dumb themselves down when they speak to black people, a new study contends (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2018/11/30/white-liberals-dumb-themselves-down-when-they-speak-black-people-new-study-contends/)

(https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1000/1*oSmnmD-8lrOO-o3_9jAUhQ.jpeg)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jul 25, 2024, 09:15 PM
Don't forget the narcissistic need to talk over and for people.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jul 25, 2024, 09:16 PM
Quote from: Janszoon on Jul 25, 2024, 07:08 PMSummer can fuck off. Fuck the heat. Fuck the humidity. Fuck sitting around sweating. Fuck the bugs. Fuck the smell of baking garbage. Fuck the people blasting shitty music from their Polaris Slingshots. And mostly importantly, fuck the forced fun of "enjoying" the "nice" weather.

Bring on the fall ASAP.

Summers have gotten too hot. I blame Liberal white girls.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Jul 26, 2024, 03:45 AM
Quote from: Janszoon on Jul 25, 2024, 07:08 PMSummer can fuck off. Fuck the heat. Fuck the humidity. Fuck sitting around sweating. Fuck the bugs. Fuck the smell of baking garbage. Fuck the people blasting shitty music from their Polaris Slingshots. And mostly importantly, fuck the forced fun of "enjoying" the "nice" weather.

Bring on the fall ASAP.

Come to Ireland, where we've never heard of summer.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/AvcUs7eCEAEAORy.jpg)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Marie Monday on Jul 26, 2024, 02:50 PM
One thing that's nice about Holland is that liberals are considered centre to right wing here (at least, if the term liberals is used in America the way I think it's used) and they dont get lumped in with leftists. Except there's always the 'oh no I'm soo left wing on social issues, I'm just more right wing when it comes to economics' people
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jul 26, 2024, 03:58 PM
Quote from: Marie Monday on Jul 26, 2024, 02:50 PMOne thing that's nice about Holland is that liberals are considered centre to right wing here (at least, if the term liberals is used in America the way I think it's used) and they dont get lumped in with leftists. Except there's always the 'oh no I'm soo left wing on social issues, I'm just more right wing when it comes to economics' people

It's the same in America, it's just that our politics are so right wing that liberals are thought of as leftists.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Janszoon on Jul 26, 2024, 04:31 PM
Quote from: Trollheart on Jul 26, 2024, 03:45 AMCome to Ireland, where we've never heard of summer.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/AvcUs7eCEAEAORy.jpg)

It sounds amazing to me.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Jul 27, 2024, 02:13 AM
I'm quite serious. I mean, we get our sunny days, but even now, in the heart of July (so what, middle of summer) we got rain. Lots of rain.

https://www.rte.ie/weather/#/22259-dublin
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jul 31, 2024, 04:31 PM
Somebody said, with data to back it up, that the biggest demographic Kamala is going to have a problem getting votes from is white girls. They said white girls will struggle with electing a black woman before a white woman because they can't stand not being the center of attention.

I felt my opinion on the average liberal white girl was validated.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Jul 31, 2024, 05:00 PM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Jul 31, 2024, 04:31 PMSomebody said, with data to back it up, that the biggest demographic Kamala is going to have a problem getting votes from is white girls. They said white girls will struggle with electing a black woman before a white woman because they can't stand not being the center of attention.

I felt my opinion on the average liberal white girl was validated.

Not that I'm disputing the conclusions of the data, but who funded it? It wasn't a certain.....non-profit foundation, was it?  :laughing:

(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/5D63/production/_91770932_clinton_getty976.jpg)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jul 31, 2024, 05:16 PM
The data was based on voting stats from the last election.

Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Jul 31, 2024, 05:39 PM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Jul 31, 2024, 04:31 PMSomebody said, with data to back it up, that the biggest demographic Kamala is going to have a problem getting votes from is white girls. They said white girls will struggle with electing a black woman before a white woman because they can't stand not being the center of attention.

I felt my opinion on the average liberal white girl was validated.

Didn't they have a special white women for Harris group on zoom that had 200k women be a part of it? They also raised 2 million off of that zoom.

I don't think it's gonna be that much a struggle for them to get on board and vote for her.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Jul 31, 2024, 06:24 PM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Jul 31, 2024, 05:16 PMThe data was based on voting stats from the last election.

Gotcha. I'd be interested in seeing the data. Just based on what you've told me, I could see multiple possible flaws with it depending on how the data is handled, interpreted and presented (as the old adage goes: "You can make statistics say anything you want" or "There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damn lies, and statistics")

In your original post, you reference that the demographic Kamala will struggle most with is 'white girls', but near the end of the post mention that the findings of the data validate your opinion about 'average liberal white girls'. It's important to remember that among all white women, there's about a 50/50 split between them re: identifying/leaning Republican vs identifying/leaning Democrat (https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/partisanship-by-race-ethnicity-and-education/)

QuoteSix-in-ten White men who are registered voters identify as Republicans or lean Republican, as do 53% of White women voters.

The balance of partisanship among White women voters has tilted toward the GOP in recent years, but it was more divided in 2017 and 2018.

Obviously, this balance tilts in one direction or another once you factor in more things like: college educated, single, married, urban, rural, etc.

I suppose I'm just curious how much we could really gather about white women's (either as a whole, or specifically liberal ones) enthusiasm (or reticence) to vote for a black woman based on the last general election when she was not at the top of the ticket. Specifically because the common prevailing belief seems to be that the VP choice doesn't really matter in the way we might usually think about it (https://www.npr.org/2024/07/25/nx-s1-5049718/vice-presidential-picks-how-much-do-they-matter) (like them delivering a battleground state for example), but rather the VP selection is to (in the best case) boost the perceptions of the voting public about the person running at the top of the ticket and the quality of their judgement:

QuoteMARTÍNEZ: So, Christopher, the answer to the question the book title poses - do running mates matter? - is apparently, no, right?

DEVINE: They don't matter in the way that we typically think of. So we think of, man, if you pick this person for vice president, people are going to love him or her so much, or maybe they dislike that person so much, that it's really going to directly affect how people vote. Or here's a way to appeal to people from a certain state, as Kyle was speaking to, or that they'll appeal to a certain demographic group. And we just find very little evidence for that. The way that they matter, A, is more in terms of shaping our perceptions of the presidential candidate. What does this pick tell you about who Kamala Harris is, or what does JD Vance tell you about who Donald Trump, at least in a second term, is going to be?

It could tell you something in Harris' case about her political ideology. Also, how good of judgment does she have? And for that matter, we show evidence of this, for example, in 2008, that John McCain's pick of Sarah Palin caused voters to think less of his judgment because they didn't believe that she was ready to be present [sic]. They thought it was an irresponsible pick, and so they were less likely to vote for McCain because of that.

Again, I'm not saying the findings of the data you're looking at are necessarily wrong, but you've got my curiosity up now.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jul 31, 2024, 08:23 PM
The data supports that white women voted Republican over Democrat.

The assumption or prediction is that they won't want to vote in a black woman before a white one. Also the common trope that white women vote on race boundaries over gender ones. IDK if data backs that up.

They also said that maybe the recent stripping of abortion rights might sway white women over to Kamala.

I just felt validated that I wasn't the only one who noticed that white girls constantly try to make themselves the center of attention which includes the liberal ones.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: degrassiknoll on Aug 01, 2024, 12:21 AM
Gay the way people prefer the guise of niceties over being direct.

Nice guys always be about saving face on the boards and would hate to be exposed for the way they talk about people here behind their backs.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 01, 2024, 12:57 AM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Jul 31, 2024, 08:23 PMThe data supports that white women voted Republican over Democrat.

The assumption or prediction is that they won't want to vote in a black woman before a white one. Also the common trope that white women vote on race boundaries over gender ones. IDK if data backs that up.

They also said that maybe the recent stripping of abortion rights might sway white women over to Kamala.

I just felt validated that I wasn't the only one who noticed that white girls constantly try to make themselves the center of attention which includes the liberal ones.

Do you have a link to the data?

If you were to look at, in a vacuum, whether white women would be more enthusiastic to vote for a white woman or a black woman (all things being equal), that's one thing, but looking at who they're more enthusiastic to vote for between a black woman and Trump (and the possibility, whether likely or not, of further restriction to abortion rights/access) is different.

By the way, the Democrats recent employment of the word 'weird' in describing Republicans is really, really excellent persuasion. Much, much better than 'they are a threat to our democracy!'. It's so much more subtle, and yet it's so much more effective. 
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 01, 2024, 01:13 AM
(https://s7d1.scene7.com/is/image/mcdonalds/mcdonalds-double-big-mac-1:1-3-product-tile-desktop?wid=829&hei=515&dpr=off)

Is this a Heart Attack Burger? FOUR burgers in one?? Who eats that? Am I just being an incredulous Irishman or is this considered normal? Note: they sell these here, too, so what do I know, but here we can pay for a packet of four burgers to fry, and if I'm having dinner the most I'd have would be 2 burgers. Can't imagine eating four, much less all at once. Am I wrong here?
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 01, 2024, 01:18 AM
Quote from: Trollheart on Aug 01, 2024, 01:13 AM(https://s7d1.scene7.com/is/image/mcdonalds/mcdonalds-double-big-mac-1:1-3-product-tile-desktop?wid=829&hei=515&dpr=off)

Is this a Heart Attack Burger? FOUR burgers in one?? Who eats that? Am I just being an incredulous Irishman or is this considered normal? Note: they sell these here, too, so what do I know, but here we can pay for a packet of four burgers to fry, and if I'm having dinner the most I'd have would be 2 burgers. Can't imagine eating four, much less all at once. Am I wrong here?

We call that a 'Mini Mac' here in America when we pick it up at McDonalds.

(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51RnzY4CkIL._AC_.jpg)

Trust me, you don't wanna see the 'Big' version.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 01, 2024, 01:21 AM
 :laughing:  :laughing:  :laughing:  :laughing:

Is this why you don't see too many thin Americans? My god, I wouldn't even be able to get my mouth wide enough to eat that, and you know how big MY mouth is!
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 01, 2024, 01:26 AM
Quote from: Trollheart on Aug 01, 2024, 01:21 AMIs this why you don't see too many thin Americans?

Jeez, you Irishmen are much quicker than you used to be; as a result, I apologize for how my ancestral countrymen treated you when you first immigrated to this country.  ;)  :laughing:
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Aug 01, 2024, 02:18 AM
Quote from: SGR on Aug 01, 2024, 12:57 AMDo you have a link to the data?

If you were to look at, in a vacuum, whether white women would be more enthusiastic to vote for a white woman or a black woman (all things being equal), that's one thing, but looking at who they're more enthusiastic to vote for between a black woman and Trump (and the possibility, whether likely or not, of further restriction to abortion rights/access) is different.

By the way, the Democrats recent employment of the word 'weird' in describing Republicans is really, really excellent persuasion. Much, much better than 'they are a threat to our democracy!'. It's so much more subtle, and yet it's so much more effective. 

I have a link but I never found any statistic other than 64% of uneducated white women voted for Trump.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/06/30/behind-bidens-2020-victory/

Quote from: degrassi.knoll on Aug 01, 2024, 12:21 AMGay the way people prefer the guise of niceties over being direct.

Nice guys always be about saving face on the boards and would hate to be exposed for the way they talk about people here behind their backs.

Ironic since you're being so indirect that I struggle to know who you're talking about.  :laughing:
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Aug 01, 2024, 02:26 AM
Quote from: Trollheart on Aug 01, 2024, 01:13 AM(https://s7d1.scene7.com/is/image/mcdonalds/mcdonalds-double-big-mac-1:1-3-product-tile-desktop?wid=829&hei=515&dpr=off)

Is this a Heart Attack Burger? FOUR burgers in one?? Who eats that? Am I just being an incredulous Irishman or is this considered normal? Note: they sell these here, too, so what do I know, but here we can pay for a packet of four burgers to fry, and if I'm having dinner the most I'd have would be 2 burgers. Can't imagine eating four, much less all at once. Am I wrong here?

(https://food.fnr.sndimg.com/content/dam/images/food/fullset/2015/5/27/0/ZR0102_Heart-Attack-Grill-Octuple-Bypass-Burger_s3x4.jpg.rend.hgtvcom.616.822.suffix/1432741031657.jpeg)

Sir put that baby Mac away. The picture above is from THE Heart Attack Grill in Las Vegas. If you order one and don't finish it all. You get subjected to spankings from the waitresses dressed as nurses.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 01, 2024, 04:05 AM
Quote from: DJChameleon on Aug 01, 2024, 02:26 AMSir put that baby Mac away. The picture above is from THE Heart Attack Grill in Las Vegas. If you order one and don't finish it all. You get subjected to spankings from the waitresses dressed as nurses.

Oh yes, here's a visual for anyone who needs it

Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Aug 01, 2024, 05:57 AM
Quote from: SGR on Aug 01, 2024, 04:05 AMOh yes, here's a visual for anyone who needs it


Oh yeah I forgot the part where they have a big scale outside and they weigh you. If you above 300 lbs., you get to enter that challenge for free but if you weigh less you have to pay.

Also the hospital garbs they put you in as well.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 01, 2024, 06:35 AM
Quote from: DJChameleon on Aug 01, 2024, 05:57 AMOh yeah I forgot the part where they have a big scale outside and they weigh you. If you above 300 lbs., you get to enter that challenge for free but if you weigh less you have to pay.

Also the hospital garbs they put you in as well.

America, baby. These Europeans wouldn't understand.  :laughing:

Yeah, I forget where I learned about this place. I watch a fair number of cooking shows, I don't remember which one put me on to this place. Definitely will go if I'm ever in Vegas. Don't think I'll take on this challenge if I do go. :laughing:
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: grindy on Aug 01, 2024, 06:55 AM
Quote from: DJChameleon on Aug 01, 2024, 02:26 AM(https://food.fnr.sndimg.com/content/dam/images/food/fullset/2015/5/27/0/ZR0102_Heart-Attack-Grill-Octuple-Bypass-Burger_s3x4.jpg.rend.hgtvcom.616.822.suffix/1432741031657.jpeg)

Sir put that baby Mac away. The picture above is from THE Heart Attack Grill in Las Vegas. If you order one and don't finish it all. You get subjected to spankings from the waitresses dressed as nurses.


Lol, I thought you were joking. I read about this place but somehow missed the nurse spanking part.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Janszoon on Aug 01, 2024, 09:48 AM
Let my burgers go!
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 02, 2024, 03:44 AM
Quote from: DJChameleon on Aug 01, 2024, 02:26 AM(https://food.fnr.sndimg.com/content/dam/images/food/fullset/2015/5/27/0/ZR0102_Heart-Attack-Grill-Octuple-Bypass-Burger_s3x4.jpg.rend.hgtvcom.616.822.suffix/1432741031657.jpeg)

Sir put that baby Mac away. The picture above is from THE Heart Attack Grill in Las Vegas. If you order one and don't finish it all. You get subjected to spankings from the waitresses dressed as nurses.


Ooh! Now I want one!  :love:
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: grindy on Aug 03, 2024, 04:46 PM
What's the deal with some destinations being only accessible with a guided tour? I get it for dangerous and difficult to reach places like caves and shit but yesterday we had this at an aquarium and today at a museum. We don't like tours. We want to explore stuff at our own pace and in our own way without having to listen to and interact with anyone else.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 04, 2024, 10:48 PM
Quote from: grindy on Aug 03, 2024, 04:46 PMWhat's the deal with some destinations being only accessible with a guided tour? I get it for dangerous and difficult to reach places like caves and shit but yesterday we had this at an aquarium and today at a museum. We don't like tours. We want to explore stuff at our own pace and in our own way without having to listen to and interact with anyone else.

Without more context, this being a thing for aquariums or museums doesn't make much sense. But it does make sense for a place like Machu Picchu, where they want to protect a historical site - and then there's things like foreign visits to North Korea where they want to protect the image of their Potemkin country. I agree with you though, most of the time, I prefer no guide and going at my own pace.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Marie Monday on Aug 05, 2024, 09:35 PM
Ugh guided tours suck so much
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Janszoon on Aug 05, 2024, 10:02 PM
Quote from: grindy on Aug 03, 2024, 04:46 PMWhat's the deal with some destinations being only accessible with a guided tour? I get it for dangerous and difficult to reach places like caves and shit but yesterday we had this at an aquarium and today at a museum. We don't like tours. We want to explore stuff at our own pace and in our own way without having to listen to and interact with anyone else.

We took a guided tour of a lightship yesterday and our tour guide had horrible B.O.. It was rough.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: grindy on Aug 05, 2024, 10:34 PM
Quote from: Janszoon on Aug 05, 2024, 10:02 PMWe took a guided tour of a lightship yesterday and our tour guide had horrible B.O.. It was rough.

Had to google what that is and tbh I wonder why anyone would be particularly interested in it at all let alone participate in a tour there. Anyway, condolences on the BO ordeal.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Janszoon on Aug 05, 2024, 10:44 PM
Quote from: grindy on Aug 05, 2024, 10:34 PMHad to google what that is and tbh I wonder why anyone would be particularly interested in it at all let alone participate in a tour there. Anyway, condolences on the BO ordeal.

It's a historical ship that you can visit with your ticket to the NYC Seaport Museum. When it was active in the early 20th century a crew of 14 people lived in it year round, so in a way I guess the B.O. probably made it a more authentic experience.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 05, 2024, 11:04 PM
Quote from: Marie Monday on Aug 05, 2024, 09:35 PMUgh guided tours suck so much

Better than those terrible misguided tours: start being shown the sights of Paris, end up in Mozambique. Hate that.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Aug 10, 2024, 09:45 PM
Image sharing on this site sucks.

I wanted to share a tweet that said

"White girls pretend to be liberal and then date boys who they KNOW go against everything they claim to believe in. This why I don't take them seriously lmao"


With a follow up that said

"Boyfriends saying every slur in the book and they be like 'we don't really talk about politics 😍'"

Part of my on going rant towards liberal white girls.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 11, 2024, 12:40 AM
And why couldn't you? I think the image posting algorithm here is great.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 11, 2024, 12:59 AM
It sounds like you're talking about the ability to embed tweets @Lucem Ferre, not specifically image sharing. @Guybrush, is there any possibility we could add the ability to embed tweets on SCD?
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Guybrush on Aug 11, 2024, 01:46 AM
Quote from: SGR on Aug 11, 2024, 12:59 AMIt sounds like you're talking about the ability to embed tweets @Lucem Ferre, not specifically image sharing. @Guybrush, is there any possibility we could add the ability to embed tweets on SCD?

Yes, I believe there is. I'll take a look at it on monday 😊
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 11, 2024, 01:55 AM
Quote from: Guybrush on Aug 11, 2024, 01:46 AMYes, I believe there is. I'll take a look at it on monday 😊

Thanks Guy! Like Lucem, I've been wanting this feature myself. :)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Aug 11, 2024, 03:14 AM
Quote from: SGR on Aug 11, 2024, 12:59 AMIt sounds like you're talking about the ability to embed tweets @Lucem Ferre, not specifically image sharing. @Guybrush, is there any possibility we could add the ability to embed tweets on SCD?

No, I tried to share an image. I posted it on Facebook first to get a url and it didn't work. Then image BB wouldn't load for some reason.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Janszoon on Aug 11, 2024, 05:47 AM
My cousin Kevin is a shithead.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 11, 2024, 06:50 AM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Aug 11, 2024, 03:14 AMNo, I tried to share an image. I posted it on Facebook first to get a url and it didn't work. Then image BB wouldn't load for some reason.

Oh well damn, I dunno what to tell you (maybe Facebook blocks the ability to directly share hosted images?). Wait...you still use Facebook?  :laughing:

If Guy adds the ability to embed tweets, I'm still calling this a win.  ;D
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 11, 2024, 06:53 AM
Quote from: Janszoon on Aug 11, 2024, 05:47 AMMy cousin Kevin is a shithead.

(https://64.media.tumblr.com/7f3ae0a2af620bdb75ee7343fd360277/tumblr_okoia7RYf31tzqospo1_540.gif)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 11, 2024, 08:23 PM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Aug 11, 2024, 03:14 AMNo, I tried to share an image. I posted it on Facebook first to get a url and it didn't work. Then image BB wouldn't load for some reason.

Image sharing should be as easy as right-clicking and selecting "copy image address" or the equiavlent on your browser. As mentioned, some dynamic image thingies won't let you copy (something to do with Java or Adobe or something?) - in those cases, I usually take a screenshot, pop it into Paint Shop or whatever graphic program you prefer, and cut out the image I want. Then I upload it to an image-sharing database like imgbox or whatever, get the link and paste it here. A lot of work, but it's one way to do it.

Another way that really works is to shout at the computer, bang your fists on the desk and your head against the wall.  :laughing:
(https://y.yarn.co/013702e1-61c8-4711-ada5-b2d26ee6f726_text.gif)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Aug 11, 2024, 08:26 PM
I know how to do it, it just didn't work and I'm on a phone.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Aug 15, 2024, 11:15 AM
The new trend appears to be playing music off a Bluetooth speaker and walking round the streets with it.

Heard something going on the other night and thought wtf is that, it was past midnight.

Some bellend walking down the road playing this (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-u0ta6AkAlQ&pp=ygUQamEgcnVsZSBuZXcgeW9yaw%3D%3D) song. I just thought what a cunt.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: SGR on Aug 15, 2024, 05:06 PM
Quote from: jimmy jazz on Aug 15, 2024, 11:15 AMThe new trend appears to be playing music off a Bluetooth speaker and walking round the streets with it.

Heard something going on the other night and thought wtf is that, it was past midnight.

Some bellend walking down the road playing this (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-u0ta6AkAlQ&pp=ygUQamEgcnVsZSBuZXcgeW9yaw%3D%3D) song. I just thought what a cunt.

@DJChameleon, get in here!  :laughing:
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lisnaholic on Aug 15, 2024, 05:53 PM
Quote from: Trollheart on Aug 05, 2024, 11:04 PMBetter than those terrible misguided tours: start being shown the sights of Paris, end up in Mozambique. Hate that.

^  :laughing:  Good one, Trolls !
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: degrassiknoll on Aug 16, 2024, 12:31 AM
Quote from: jimmy jazz on Aug 15, 2024, 11:15 AMThe new trend appears to be playing music off a Bluetooth speaker and walking round the streets with it.

Heard something going on the other night and thought wtf is that, it was past midnight.

Some bellend walking down the road playing this (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-u0ta6AkAlQ&pp=ygUQamEgcnVsZSBuZXcgeW9yaw%3D%3D) song. I just thought what a cunt.

Lol the Bluetooth is the only new thing I'm afraid.

A coworker recently got a pair of crocs with bluetooth capabilities.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Marie Monday on Aug 16, 2024, 12:34 AM
Quote from: degrassi.knoll on Aug 16, 2024, 12:31 AMa pair of crocs with bluetooth capabilities.
(https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:445/0*mSyhZU46vNE-_gq0.jpg)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Aug 16, 2024, 12:37 AM
Quote from: jimmy jazz on Aug 15, 2024, 11:15 AMThe new trend appears to be playing music off a Bluetooth speaker and walking round the streets with it.

Heard something going on the other night and thought wtf is that, it was past midnight.

Some bellend walking down the road playing this (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-u0ta6AkAlQ&pp=ygUQamEgcnVsZSBuZXcgeW9yaw%3D%3D) song. I just thought what a cunt.

It was me. what of it?

I played this afterwards

Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 16, 2024, 02:12 AM
Having been one of those who walked around with a (ahem) small boom box when considerably younger, I probably can't criticise. But hey, I'm an old man now, so I will. It's my right as an old fogey to moan about the things all you young 'uns do, conveniently forgetting (my memory's not what it used to be) that I used to do them too.

But really, what is the deal with wanting everyone to have to listen to your music? In my day (here he goes again) we had walkman tape players, so even then you could listen to your music privately while out. Sure, we still had the boombox walking dead, but not quite so much of it. Now though, with such things as, as you say, bluetooth so you can listen to music on your phone without a need for cables, why is it necessary to expose other people who may not enjoy your music to the delights of whatever you're listening to? Seems like pure arrogance to me, like those people who have to turn their speakers around and face them out the window. Hey dude or dudess! Not everyone wants to hear your god-damn music!

And while we're at it, how can people listen to music in cars so loud? I passed a car a few weeks ago and the windows were up but even from maybe six feet away (I was walking) you could hear the bass shaking the car. Imagine what it was like inside! And then imagine trying to concentrate on your driving with that racket!
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Aug 16, 2024, 05:31 AM
Quote from: degrassi.knoll on Aug 16, 2024, 12:31 AMLol the Bluetooth is the only new thing I'm afraid.

A coworker recently got a pair of crocs with bluetooth capabilities.

Oh we've always had the music people round here but this is the first time I've ever seen or heard someone doing this with a Bluetooth speaker. It was loud as well.

@Trollheart I think it's a showing off sort of thing. Everybody look at me and my music taste. BTW I'd never wear headphones publicly, it's too dangerous. But I would just wait until I'm home to listen to music.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lisnaholic on Aug 17, 2024, 01:56 AM
Ha ! It's not just my poor hearing. Today I caught those automatically-generated subtitle texts making the same mistake that I sometimes do: a newscaster obviously meant "aren't", but was so lazy in his enunciation that me and the auto-text both heard "are". Frankly, if you're not going to bother pronouncing "are" or "aren't" with proper clarity, why bother saying your sentence at all. Ditto goes with "can" and "can't": being complete opposites, not pronouncing them clearly is about as useful as answering a question with "nyeh" or "yope".
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Aug 17, 2024, 02:08 AM
My nieces answer questions with "nar" or "yar" and they don't even know what Sean of the Dead is.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 17, 2024, 03:52 AM
Quote from: Lisnaholic on Aug 17, 2024, 01:56 AMHa ! It's not just my poor hearing. Today I caught those automatically-generated subtitle texts making the same mistake that I sometimes do: a newscaster obviously meant "aren't", but was so lazy in his enunciation that me and the auto-text both heard "are". Frankly, if you're not going to bother pronouncing "are" or "aren't" with proper clarity, why bother saying your sentence at all. Ditto goes with "can" and "can't": being complete opposites, not pronouncing them clearly is about as useful as answering a question with "nyeh" or "yope".

Can we build it? Yes we can't!  :laughing:
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lexi Darling on Aug 17, 2024, 05:15 AM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Aug 17, 2024, 02:08 AMMy nieces answer questions with "nar" or "yar" and they don't even know what Sean of the Dead is.

Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Aug 17, 2024, 06:28 AM
Quote from: jimmy jazz on Aug 16, 2024, 05:31 AMOh we've always had the music people round here but this is the first time I've ever seen or heard someone doing this with a Bluetooth speaker. It was loud as well.

@Trollheart I think it's a showing off sort of thing. Everybody look at me and my music taste. BTW I'd never wear headphones publicly, it's too dangerous. But I would just wait until I'm home to listen to music.

I always wear my headphones around. Over the head ones and when they die it's Bluetooth speaker time. What's dangerous about wearing headphones in public?
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Guybrush on Aug 17, 2024, 07:27 AM
Quote from: DJChameleon on Aug 17, 2024, 06:28 AMI always wear my headphones around. Over the head ones and when they die it's Bluetooth speaker time. What's dangerous about wearing headphones in public?

I'd assume mostly getting run over by bikes and cars that you don't hear coming.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Aug 17, 2024, 11:39 AM
^^
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Aug 17, 2024, 02:21 PM
Quote from: Guybrush on Aug 17, 2024, 07:27 AMI'd assume mostly getting run over by bikes and cars that you don't hear coming.

I'm always vigilant when crossing the street and my music is never so loud that I can't hear cars coming or sirens from emergency vehicles.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Aug 17, 2024, 02:50 PM
Quote from: DJChameleon on Aug 17, 2024, 02:21 PMI'm always vigilant when crossing the street and my music is never so loud that I can't hear cars coming or sirens from emergency vehicles.

Some of them are surprisingly quiet. Especially these electric scooters that are appearing everywhere.

Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Aug 17, 2024, 05:53 PM
Quote from: jimmy jazz on Aug 17, 2024, 02:50 PMSome of them are surprisingly quiet. Especially these electric scooters that are appearing everywhere.



Must be nice to be around those. All the bikes that get ridden in my city are loud as hell and super annoying.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Marie Monday on Aug 17, 2024, 06:23 PM
Quote from: DJChameleon on Aug 17, 2024, 02:21 PMI'm always vigilant when crossing the street and my music is never so loud that I can't hear cars coming or sirens from emergency vehicles.
yeah you'd be one of those tourists I'd yell at from my bike in amsterdam for sure xoxo
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Aug 17, 2024, 07:26 PM
Quote from: DJChameleon on Aug 17, 2024, 05:53 PMMust be nice to be around those. All the bikes that get ridden in my city are loud as hell and super annoying.

I nearly got hit by one the other day. Two lads on one scooter. Was about 11pm and pitch black, no lights.



Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: degrassiknoll on Aug 17, 2024, 10:29 PM
Pet peeve: people that think "satire" is a term interchangeable with "parody"
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 18, 2024, 01:02 AM
In the same vein, irony and sarcasm, and people constantly using the former when they mean the latter. Also, while we're at it, people using literally when they really mean figuratively.  ::)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: degrassiknoll on Aug 18, 2024, 03:54 AM
I use literally in the colloquial sense just as often a I decorate my speech with "like" lol which is a LOT

Being better on paper is my toxic trait lol
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Aug 18, 2024, 09:14 AM
It always bothers me when Kanye stans make fun of Drake for having ghost writers.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: grindy on Aug 18, 2024, 09:35 AM
KIDS SEE GHOSTWRITERS
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 19, 2024, 01:04 AM
Quote from: Lucem Ferre on Aug 18, 2024, 09:14 AMIt always bothers me when Kanye stans make fun of Drake for having ghost writers.

Satan makes fun of Dracula for having ghost writers?
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Aug 20, 2024, 12:41 AM
Idk why I noticed it more today but it has definitely been going on a lot lately. Social media is a cesspool with people posting bait just to engagement farm.

I noticed it so much more today on X and FB but I've noticed it on FB for awhile now it's just today seems like overload.

IG is the only safe place.

TikTok, FB, X, Threads(which is mostly just filled with OF girls at this point)

I get it that people are getting paid for these posts but it's just at an all time high and that's all anyone posts anymore engagement farming trolls.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Aug 20, 2024, 01:11 AM
Twitter used to be alright.

Blue tick wankers, OnlyFans spammers and crypto nonces. That's about 75% of the accounts and tweets now.

Thanks Elon! Tesla shagging prick.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Aug 20, 2024, 01:38 AM
A few things for an old guy's edification: OF girls? Engagement farm? Blue tick wankers?

And by the way, now that that cunt Musk has changed the name, what do you call the messages? Twitter had Tweets, what's X got? Kisses? Gobshite. They had a cool little cute logo and a good  system going - twitter/pointless chatter/birds/tweets. What the fuck do you do with X? Man I hate that guy.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Guybrush on Aug 20, 2024, 06:40 AM
Yes. At least twitter had some modicum of identity with a charm to it. X vaguely reminds me of of axe bodyspray and juvenile toxic masculinity.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Aug 20, 2024, 12:59 PM
Quote from: Trollheart on Aug 20, 2024, 01:38 AMA few things for an old guy's edification: OF girls? Engagement farm? Blue tick wankers?

And by the way, now that that cunt Musk has changed the name, what do you call the messages? Twitter had Tweets, what's X got? Kisses? Gobshite. They had a cool little cute logo and a good  system going - twitter/pointless chatter/birds/tweets. What the fuck do you do with X? Man I hate that guy.

Tweets are now just posts. Zero personality. He had such a hard on for X. PayPal was once called X for a bit before it got turned into PayPal which makes more sense.

OF girls = only fans girls(they post pics of themselves in lingerie hoping to get people to look at their profile to click the link that leads to their amateur porn site that you have to pay a subscription for or subscribe for free. The free subscription ones just end up bombarding your inbox with locked messages that you have to pay per message to reveal pics/vids.

Blue tick wankers = anyone that pays for it on X. You can pay for it and get certain ads removed. It used to be helpful to tell when someone was an official account like a celebrities official account now anyone with 8 bucks I think can get it. There are other benefits but I haven't looked into it.

Engagement farm = people say controversial takes just to get people riled up so that they comment, like, re-post and share the topic and it gets more views. In the back end people get paid based off of how many views, comments and likes a post gets. So much so that people will buy bots to reply to people's comments so that they get more comments added in the post for a higher check/payout.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Aug 21, 2024, 01:07 PM
Since you mentioned bots, you just reminded me of the amount of boomers on Twitter who accuse people of being bots and clearly don't know what a bot is.

I asked one why he called someone a bot and he said 'anonymous account resorting to abuse, and has right wing opinions'.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Aug 23, 2024, 01:01 PM
Quote from: jimmy jazz on Aug 21, 2024, 01:07 PMSince you mentioned bots, you just reminded me of the amount of boomers on Twitter who accuse people of being bots and clearly don't know what a bot is.

I asked one why he called someone a bot and he said 'anonymous account resorting to abuse, and has right wing opinions'.

Instead of being called a bot I was once called AI 😆.

I took it as a compliment and joked about it. People don't really know the difference between bots and real people. If they don't like someone's opinion they are automatically a bot.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Guybrush on Aug 24, 2024, 08:27 AM
One of my early and small forays into python coding was customizing, compiling and running a talking IRC-bot. Think it was called a gruftibot? This was probably the very late 90s.. And I named it Didymus, like the fox creature that guards the bridge out of the bog of eternal stench.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: grindy on Aug 28, 2024, 11:22 AM
It's so deeply fucked up how my fellow countrywomen have internalised our retarded, misogynistic, Eastern European culture. I mean, I kinda get why the men perpetuate it, it's a pretty sweet deal (if you're an amoral piece of shit). But I see so many smart, nice, otherwise quite modern women living together with some parasitic, hateful loser who treats them like a servant, being unhappy as fuck and being all like "Well, to endure is a woman's lot, it's been like this for the previous generations, it's gonna be the same for me." (And yes, the previous is a real quote). Like what the actual fuck.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Guybrush on Aug 28, 2024, 05:45 PM
Quote from: grindy on Aug 28, 2024, 11:22 AMIt's so deeply fucked up how my fellow countrywomen have internalised our retarded, misogynistic, Eastern European culture. I mean, I kinda get why the men perpetuate it, it's a pretty sweet deal (if you're an amoral piece of shit). But I see so many smart, nice, otherwise quite modern women living together with some parasitic, hateful loser who treats them like a servant, being unhappy as fuck and being all like "Well, to endure is a woman's lot, it's been like this for the previous generations, it's gonna be the same for me." (And yes, the previous is a real quote). Like what the actual fuck.

Ugh, yes. Sad state of affairs.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Shhon on Aug 31, 2024, 03:25 PM
Quote from: Guybrush on Aug 24, 2024, 08:27 AMOne of my early and small forays into python coding was customizing, compiling and running a talking IRC-bot. Think it was called a gruftibot? This was probably the very late 90s.. And I named it Didymus, like the fox creature that guards the bridge out of the bog of eternal stench.
developing an IRC bot is pretty cool

ive made a butt ton of stuff with python but never even thought about an IRC bot, i stopped using IRC in 2015

i was a big IRC user though and a python bot fren would have been fun lol
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: QuantumSync on Nov 23, 2024, 10:28 PM
this is a nice one here yall:


City-Data = mostly hardcore right leaning:

https://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/3490188-new-rule-tough-love-dems-real.html#post67335465
(commented and liked this recent Bill Maher video)

Boxden/BX = mostly hardcore left leaning:
https://boxden.com/showthread.php?t=3403637
(commented and liked this recent Bill Maher video)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Dec 03, 2024, 04:37 PM
Bought some flushable wipes for cleaning my arsehole after a shit.

Flushed two.

My friend just told me you're not supposed to flush them even though they say flushable.

I feel frustrated, stupid and disappointed.

I deserve everything I get.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Guybrush on Dec 03, 2024, 06:53 PM
Quote from: jimmy jazz on Dec 03, 2024, 04:37 PMBought some flushable wipes for cleaning my arsehole after a shit.

Flushed two.

My friend just told me you're not supposed to flush them even though they say flushable.

I feel frustrated, stupid and disappointed.

I deserve everything I get.

What are they made of?
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Dec 03, 2024, 08:39 PM
Quote from: Guybrush on Dec 03, 2024, 06:53 PMWhat are they made of?

Doesn't say.

This is them - https://groceries.asda.com/product/moist-toilet-tissue/asda-shades-sensitive-flushable-moist-toilet-tissue-wipes/1000383166449
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Dec 04, 2024, 04:11 AM
Why in the name of Satan's portion would they say they were flushable and then tell you not to flush them? Surely that's like saying, oh this vehicle can off-road, but don't ever off-road in it! Reminds me of a client I used to deal with, said "Here's my home phone number, but for god's sake don't ever use it!"  ::)
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: DJChameleon on Dec 04, 2024, 11:43 AM
Quote from: jimmy jazz on Dec 03, 2024, 08:39 PMDoesn't say.

This is them - https://groceries.asda.com/product/moist-toilet-tissue/asda-shades-sensitive-flushable-moist-toilet-tissue-wipes/1000383166449


Do the rip test. If they rip as easily as regular toilet paper then it's fine. Usually flushable wipes tend to be slightly stronger than toilet paper and shouldnt be flushed if that's the case. It means they won't break down as easily as TP.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: jimmy jazz on Dec 04, 2024, 03:21 PM
Quote from: Trollheart on Dec 04, 2024, 04:11 AMWhy in the name of Satan's portion would they say they were flushable and then tell you not to flush them? Surely that's like saying, oh this vehicle can off-road, but don't ever off-road in it! Reminds me of a client I used to deal with, said "Here's my home phone number, but for god's sake don't ever use it!"  ::)

It doesn't say not to flush them on the packaging. You're just not supposed to anyway.

Quote from: DJChameleon on Dec 04, 2024, 11:43 AMDo the rip test. If they rip as easily as regular toilet paper then it's fine. Usually flushable wipes tend to be slightly stronger than toilet paper and shouldnt be flushed if that's the case. It means they won't break down as easily as TP.

They're a bit more resilient. :(
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Dec 04, 2024, 07:53 PM
It's the same argument though. Even if they don't specifically say "don't flush them", they're actually telling you as a buyer that you can, so why then do people say don't do it? No entender senor.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Guybrush on Dec 05, 2024, 10:57 PM
Hopefully they're made of paper / cellulose and so will dissolve.

An aside, but wet wipes are a menace to our wastewater pumps. They get lodged in the pumps and accumulate there, turning into big, ragged lumps that vaguely resemble dead cats or some other hairy animal. Eventually, they completely clog/gum things up and the pumps need to be opened up so you can remove them. It quickly causes pollution when sewage isn't getting to where it needs to go and takes time to fix.. and of course the people fixing it are exposed to sewage with the related risks and everyone prefers less of that.. Unless they have some very strange kinks.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Trollheart on Dec 06, 2024, 01:06 AM
Aw, I thought you were going to say eventually they gain sentience and turn into monstrous wads of papers rolling through the countryside in search of arses to wipe! (Note: remember this for a short story. Note 2: remember to up TH's medication; this could be serious)...
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Lucem Ferre on Jan 24, 2025, 07:32 AM
I've noticed there are a lot of superficial feminists that exploit the movement to push bigoted narratives about immigrants being rapists or just blatant transphobia. It's probably just social media amplifying the worst of the worst, as usual.

Regardless, it's still annoying because I care about the movement not just because I care about women but also because I feel like feminism does far more to address problems men face than any men's rights activist does. High jacking that to push a vapid surface level analysis & bigotry gives me the ick.

Hopefully it's just a social media thing. I can always clock them too. Like, they'll accuse everyman that slept with that one girl whom slept with like 100 men in 1 day of being rapists and when you scroll their profile there's always transphobic bullshit and sometimes racist anti-immigrant crap.
Title: Re: The rant thread
Post by: Marie Monday on Jan 24, 2025, 09:23 PM
yeah this is the same kind of stuff as terfs, probably the same people. very frustrating.